Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Main Dish

Help Wanted

A look at the hiring practices at U.S. nuclear power plants

By Shelley Smithson
26 Mar 2002
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Could the Sept. 11 hijackers have gotten jobs at nuclear power plants? Under the current rules governing nuclear safety, at least some of them could have easily gone to work as janitors, carpenters, computer programmers, or other plant employees, according to Dave Lochbaum, a nuclear safety engineer who works for the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Before last fall's terrorist attacks, utilities submitted fingerprints of job applicants to the FBI for criminal background checks -- but the FBI didn't cross-reference the names with its list of known terrorists. Now, "everybody working at plants or who has ever worked at the plants," has been checked against the FBI list, said Alan Madison, chief of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's safeguards section.

But utilities still are granting temporary clearances to new employees while the FBI completes background checks. To receive provisional access, new hires are only required to present photo ID, pass a credit check, provide a character reference and five-year job history, and take a psychological test. Before Sept. 11, even gun-carrying security guards were allowed temporary clearances, as were janitors, vendors who stock soda and candy machines, engineers, and control room operators. The Union of Concerned Scientists discovered a number of cases in which new employees who had worked inside the plant more than a month were dismissed when the FBI returned details about their criminal history.

Now, new employees awaiting FBI clearance are not allowed in vital areas -- places with back-up pumps, generators, and power supply boxes, Madison said. "If their talents are required for essential activities," they are allowed into such areas, but only when accompanied by another plant employee. The Union of Concerned Scientists says even long-time employees should not be allowed into vital areas alone. A two-person rule, which is used in the military, would eliminate the opportunity for a single employee to sabotage equipment, Lochbaum said.

Several citizen groups, including UCS, have called on the NRC to periodically re-screen all employees, something that was recommended by an NRC advisory committee two decades ago. "Some workers can and do develop criminal records after gaining unescorted privileges at nuclear facilities," Lochbaum said.

In The Same Vein
Put This in Your Pipeline and Smoke It
Domestic oil and gas is not the ticket to U.S. energy security
A Nuke Lease on Life
Enviros try to put the R back in the NRC
The NRC requires that supervisors monitor employees for drug and alcohol use and for mental stability. But staff cuts at nuclear utilities nationwide -- the result of competition in the electricity market -- mean there are fewer supervisors to monitor employees. Barry Quigley, a reactor operator at an Illinois nuclear plant, said most supervisors don't have time to observe employee behavior, and many employees work without supervision.

Quigley also said managers are not trained to detect patterns of unstable behavior. For example, at one plant, the only training question that supervisors must answer about mental stability is: "Is a person sitting on the floor crying an example of aberrant behavior?"

"We may never know," Quigley said, "but I doubt that the 19 bastards [who hijacked the planes] spent much time sitting on the floor crying before Sept. 11."

Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Shelley Smithson is a freelance writer in Farmington, N.M.
< Previous | Next >
Comments: There are no comments. Be the first to post!

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


Also in Grist

The Week's Most Popular



From the Archives
Safety Dance, Part One, by Shelley Smithson. How secure are U.S. nuclear power plants?
Blood and Water, Part Two, by Jessica McCallin. Without fair water distribution, the Middle East peace process is all dried up.
Blood and Water, Part One, by Jessica McCallin. Israel and Palestine struggle over water in an arid land.

ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks