|
|
||
One for the RoadlessHow we could save both forests and jobs30 Jun 2000
The "roadless" road show swept the nation last week as U.S. Forest Service officials collected public comment on President Clinton's initiative to prohibit road building in national forests where no roads now exist.
What's missing from this picture?
Photo: U.S. Forest Service.
Residents of Missoula, Mont., got a special sideshow. About 2,000 opponents from across western Montana rolled into town on a convoy of logging trucks and buses. Rally attendees included loggers, mill workers, and off-road-vehicle riders. The timber workers are afraid they'll lose jobs because of the ban. ORV enthusiasts want more roads to ride. I can sympathize with the loggers and mill workers, but I don't understand the logic of the motorheads. If you build a road into a wild area, it loses its mystique and becomes just like any other roaded forest. If motorheads aren't happy with the 380,000 miles of forest roads that already exist, they never will be.
Sign of the times.
Photo: U.S. PIRG.
Industry spokespeople pointed out that four national forests in western Montana and northern Idaho would lose already-planned timber sales to the road-building ban. But they didn't mention that the Forest Service would still allow them to cut 75 million board feet of timber in roadless areas by 2005 -- without building new roads. Here are some other facts that industry mouthpieces don't mention:
Since 1996, Louisiana Pacific has sold or shut down two plywood plants, 35 lumber mills, and four particle board operations. "It's all about modernization and which mills are best suited," Suwyn said.
How many more roads do we need?
Photo: USFWS.
Technology and the economy will continue to nibble away at mill jobs no matter how many trees the federal government cuts. But loggers, who deliver the raw product to the factories, have a chance to increase their work opportunities. Rather than berating public officials for limiting timber harvests, they should lobby the Forest Service to hire them to restore forest health. According to the General Accounting Office, lush undergrowth has created catastrophic fire danger on 39 million acres in the interior West. Thinning the undergrowth not only could curtail the fire danger, but also allow the remaining trees to grow healthier. Across western Montana and northern Idaho, about 500,000 acres of land that was clear-cut 20 to 30 years ago desperately need thinning. In these areas, loggers with chainsaws would leave the best tree within a 10- to 12-foot diameter and cut every other tree that reaches above their kneecaps. It's hot, dirty work and not as romantic as toppling tall timber with heavy equipment, but it's a steady paycheck. And there would be another benefit to loggers -- the wholehearted support of the public. |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
![]() From the Archives
The Lion's Share, by Susan J. Tweit, Writers on the Range. It's high time people stopped shooting mountain lions.
Roadless Is More, by John Baden, Joshua Zaffos, Writers on the Range . A conservative argument for Clinton's forest initiative.
Sunny-Side Up, by Patrick Mazza. Now's the time to make the big leap to clean energy.
|
|
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.